[OGSA-BES-WG] ActivityStatusType in bes-factory.xsd

Christopher Smith csmith at platform.com
Thu Oct 19 11:39:33 CDT 2006

On 19/10/06 08:48, "Peter G. Lane" <lane at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:

>> Given the text in the bes specification (v26), the type of the elements
>> within ActivityStatusType should not be xsd:anyType, but should use the
>> definitions as follows. This is in line with the extensible state model as
>> described in the specification:
> The difference being the ##other namespace, right? Otherwise I think they're
> functionally equivalent.
I guess as long as it's functionally equivalent I don't care. I wasn't sure
that it is, but you're right, it is ... well ... other than the ##other. Is
that so important, I wonder?

>> Um ... how can we track these issues, and (more importantly) quickly get
>> some closure on them in order to update our implementations?
> Great question. I lost track of where the spec is. Last I remember it was
> going to be edited for
> release. What's going on with that? Unless someone objects, I think we could
> easily hold a lazy vote
> (i.e. -1, +0, +1) on these schema "bug fixes" and then update the spec if no
> -1's are encountered
> within a few days.
I'm for this ... it would be nice to get some of these things changed before
the final spec is written. :-)

-- Chris

More information about the ogsa-bes-wg mailing list