[occi-wg] confusion about status of link / headers
garymazzaferro at gmail.com
Tue Oct 20 18:24:44 CDT 2009
If you feel that this is the best way for move occi forward, go for it.
I'm iust trying to preserve the integrity of the work and support it
properly in this group. I will be rolling out an occi interface or occi
like interface publicly by Q1'10. I will not be deploying this proposed
protocol until it is proven to work in a global environment. If that
means abandoning occi, well, I'll abandon occi.
I personally, feel I cannot and will not risk a customer's business or
the livelihood of partners and their families on a single opinion and
unproven technology. When you get real numbers from a global time study,
I'll be glad to review them and support your efforts.
Enjoy your night off.
Sam Johnston wrote:
> And here I was thinking I was getting the night off...
> I am advocating this is not the only interface.
> It's not the only interface - there's currently this one for machines
> and XHTML5 for users (and masochistic machines who like to parse XML).
> However it is the only interface users would have to implement (rather
> than having to code XML, JSON *and* text, which was the case before).
> Anyway I see Adrian has kindly stepped up to discuss the details with
> you so I can get back to writing PyUnit unit tests.
More information about the occi-wg