[occi-wg] confusion about status of link / headers
Tim.Bray at Sun.COM
Mon Oct 19 11:46:21 CDT 2009
On 2009-10-19, at 9:42 AM, Alexis Richardson wrote:
>> In practice, I've had experience with three processes; ...
>> In the W3C, you argue for a
>> while and then the chair (co-chairs usually) assert what the
>> consensus is.
>> Informally consensus is considered to be the absence of sustained
>> reasonable resistance. If you disagree you appeal to the Area
>> Director, the
>> IESG, the IAB and eventually the Internet Society (I may have that
>> chain out of order).
> Did you mean 'IETF' for this last item?
Urgh, right of course. Sorry -T
More information about the occi-wg