[occi-wg] confusion about status of link / headers

Tim Bray Tim.Bray at Sun.COM
Mon Oct 19 11:46:21 CDT 2009

On 2009-10-19, at 9:42 AM, Alexis Richardson wrote:

>> In practice, I've had experience with three processes; ...
>> ...
>>  In the W3C, you argue for a
>> while and then the chair (co-chairs usually) assert what the  
>> consensus is.
>> Informally consensus is considered to be the absence of sustained  
>> intense
>> reasonable resistance.  If you disagree you appeal to the Area  
>> Director, the
>> IESG, the IAB and eventually the Internet Society (I may have that  
>> appeal
>> chain out of order).
> Did you mean 'IETF' for this last item?

Urgh, right of course.  Sorry -T

More information about the occi-wg mailing list