[occi-wg] Call Followup
Mark A. Carlson
Mark.Carlson at Sun.COM
Wed Apr 29 10:55:39 CDT 2009
Randy Bias wrote:
> Just want to clarify re: storage that we don't need it in the initial
> draft, but are keen to have a standard around some aspects of it. If
> I recall correctly we drew the line on storage saying that the core
> API functionality would allow managing it at the infrastructure (disk,
> mount, etc.) level, but not necessarily at the file/object level.
> We'll also need the latter, which is what I believe the SNIA folks
> are working on. I can't recall the particular working group. Mark
> Carlson, do you know which one it is?
The SNIA Cloud Storage TWG is the central organizing point for all the APIs.
There are other TWGs with related work such as SMI-S, Long Term Archive,
XAM and Hypervisor Storage APIs.
There is a Google group that is available to non-members as well:
> Anyway, in order of priority my desired list of deliverables looks
> something like this:
> 1) Clean core API + extensibility delivered ASAP (preferably by
> end of June)
> 2) Storage mgmt extensions for block devices and mount points (end
> of July)
> 3) File/object based extensions to allowing send/receive and
> arbitrary URLs for retrieval of any given file/object (end of August)
> Just putting my desired scenario and objectives here. I realize we
> might not be able to achieve all of these in this time frame. I also
> realize that SNIA probably is the best owner for 3. I'm eager for
> them to join us on the next call.
It'll be the May 13th call.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the occi-wg