[occi-wg] Resource Types: Compute / Network / Storage
simon.wardley at canonical.com
Sun Apr 19 15:20:56 CDT 2009
> Unfortunately by doing so your taxonomy no longer functions as a
Of course it does, there is no specific set rules about how defined a
taxonomy must be just consensus around a set of terms.
In my opinion you're making things unnecessarily complex.
> FYI the process of generating the last stack involved classifying
> everything cloud-related
I'm not sure what you're talking about here?
> The observation that an application can feed another
A taxonomy to identify discrete layers of the computing stack says
nothing about how those layers can interact with each other. You don't
need to make things this complex.
> Trying to represent that an application can also serve as part of a
> platform results in both junk and confusion.
This is only true if you're trying to create a description which
enforces how something is used.
An application can happily be built upon a platform which also consumes
feeds from multiple applications that themselves are built upon ....
this is fine.
A taxonomy doesn't have to define order of use or operation. Keep it
> I'm hoping that by covering everything concisely as we have here the
> result won't be rejected as "too simplistic".
Simplicity is key. You've gone to far and created a rod for your own
> If however it makes sense to boil it down further for your particular
> application then go right ahead.
I now don't know what you're talking about.
Software Services Manager,
TEL: +44 (0)207 630 2451
MOB : +44 (0)7972 911 449
More information about the occi-wg