[occi-wg] Semantics of OCCI API: nouns and verbs
samj at samj.net
Thu Apr 16 15:17:40 CDT 2009
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:07 PM, <eprparadocs at gmail.com> wrote:
> I prefer a simple XML rendering (and Atom seems way too heavy) for all
> the requests. That includes putting in things like set, destroy,etc. The
> protocol step should be to map the definitions into something bitsy!
If you have to parse XML anyway (which I agree can be a PITA, hence adopting
Chris & Richard's suggestions for text/json equivalents) then it's
incrementally more difficult to use an existing schema. Corners cut now will
certainly come back to bite us later, and as we flesh things out I'm sure
you will agree that Atom more than pulls its weight in this context.
The value of existing developers and client implementations is not to be
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the occi-wg