[occi-wg] Syntax of OCCI API
chris.webb at elastichosts.com
Thu Apr 16 06:04:12 CDT 2009
Andre Merzky <andre at merzky.net> writes:
> Quoting [Alexis Richardson] (Apr 16 2009):
> > Is it your view that:
> > 1. These should NOT be described in the API
> > 2. These should be described but in a 'non core' section of the API
> 3. these would be described in the API (core or non-core)
> but would be marked 'Optional' (*)
> (*) implementations would still be standard compliant if
> they do not provide these optional methods, and flag a
> respecitve error when these get called.
Personally I think (3) is the natural thing to do too.
More information about the occi-wg