[DRMAA-WG] meeting minutes March 3rd 2010
peter at troeger.eu
Mon Mar 29 04:04:10 CDT 2010
>>> Explicit statement for DRMS that don't have information from
>>> Up to
>>> the implementation which fields are reported.
>> I don't really understand this part.
> The proposal was just to add information (or an explicit statement) to
> the standard, that it is up to the implementation which fields
> are updated (and if the fields are updated at all). Because, if
> I remember correctly, that polling for information from client
> side to master and master to execution host can create much overhead
> (costs) and therefore from some implementation it can be better
> (when they have no imformation at master side) to report nothing.
This is now part of the JobInfo data structure description:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 2208 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/drmaa-wg/attachments/20100329/bbddcd45/attachment.bin
More information about the drmaa-wg