Rajic, Hrabri hrabri.rajic at intel.com
Thu Oct 4 10:43:36 CDT 2007

Good point.

The discussions are still at the conceptual, internal level, so your
info is timely.   As it seems all we could fit on a small DRMAA logo is
another acronym or image.

Also, it is not clear how it would be used.   Enabled by (OGF)
DRMAA(TM), logo on the pages, trade marking, etc.  Give us more time to
rumble ...


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Steven Newhouse [mailto:Steven.Newhouse at microsoft.com]
>Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 10:24 AM
>To: Rajic, Hrabri; Fritz Ferstl; Peter Troeger
>Cc: DRMAA Working Group
>Subject: RE: [DRMAA-WG] DRMAA Logo?
>What no acknowledgement of OGF in the logo? Shame on you all...
>If you are serious about developing a brand - you should get in touch
>the OGF office (marketing) about trademark protection etc. For instance
>OGSA is registered so that we can protect that brand.

More information about the drmaa-wg mailing list