[drmaa-wg] Questions

Rajic, Hrabri hrabri.rajic at intel.com
Wed Mar 30 14:57:05 CST 2005

>> [ .. ]
>> The routine return code would need to indicate a compound error; BTW
>> do not have such error code defined, and the detailed error message
>> would need to detail what happened.
>In other words, the spec completely fails to address this case.
>Something to keep in mind for 1.1 or 2.0.

It looks like no specifics are necessary for defining the compound
error.  Should we give it a thought now and put it in the revised v1.0
if it remains relatively simple to define and implement?


More information about the drmaa-wg mailing list