[occi-wg] Infrastructure Templates (was: OS Templates)
ralf at nyren.net
Thu Oct 7 06:44:14 CDT 2010
Indeed, that is the way I had it until we changed it after a discussion on
IRC if you remember :D
Now, read section "4.1.2 Categories" in Core. In order to allow the
template Category to relate to a base type Category this section must be
changed. Doing so however may (depending on how it is redefined) remove
the distinction between a Category defining a sub-type of Kind and a
Category used to assign tags to Kind _instances_.
On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 00:49:42 +0200, Edmonds, AndrewX
<andrewx.edmonds at intel.com> wrote:
> Yes it MUST be related otherwise you have no indication of what Resource
> template refers to.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ralf Nyren [mailto:ralf at nyren.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 12:34 PM
> To: Edmonds, AndrewX; occi-wg
> Subject: Re: [occi-wg] Infrastructure Templates (was: OS Templates)
> Found another issue while updating the wiki page.
> The page currently says a Resource template MUST be related to the
> Category defining the Resource type. This is currently not allowed by
> Core. Only Categories defining a sub-type of Resource/Link/Action are
> allowed to be related (directly or indirectly) to the base type
> The reason for this is that without the restriction it is not possible to
> distinguish a sub-type (taxonomy) Category from any random tag
> (folksonomy) Category.
> regards, Ralf
> On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 22:43:20 +0200, Edmonds, AndrewX
> <andrewx.edmonds at intel.com> wrote:
>> Hey again,
>> I've added a description of OS templates and from input from the WG
>> (incl Gary; thanks) a description of how we might do Resource Templates.
>> can be found here  and as ever comments etc are eagerly needed :-)
More information about the occi-wg