[Nml-wg] id/idref and inverse relations
Freek.Dijkstra at sara.nl
Wed Apr 4 07:14:40 EDT 2012
Roman Łapacz wrote:
> I'm not sure that we really need to have the inverse relation in all
> cases. I'm not against but maybe the types like
> "partofSerialCompoundLink" should be treated as extensions (different
> namespace of attribute, eg. nml-ext:type). This way the core set of
> types would be minimal (its values would be the most useful and popular).
Roman, you're a proponent of allowing inverse relations.
Could you give a use case why we need it in the first place?
More information about the nml-wg