[Nml-wg] Session notes for NML
zurawski at internet2.edu
Tue Aug 16 08:45:19 CDT 2011
On 8/16/11 6:09 AM, thus spake Freek Dijkstra:
> Hi Jason,
> I was re-reading our mail, and I don't recall what you meant with the
> following comment:
>> On 7/16/11 4:13 PM, thus spake Freek Dijkstra:
>>> * The ordered list on itself is not enclosed in it's own XML tag (like
>>> <nml:list>), the elements are direct subelements of the parent
>>> <relation> tag.
>> It was discussed to modify the existing UML diagram to allow multiple
>> entities in a relationship in accordance with this topic.
Someone, I believe it was Jeroen but I could be wrong, noted that the
UML diagrams only allowed a single item in a relationship. Since many
of our latest examples and thoughts revolved around being able to relate
multiple items, I proposed that the UML diagram be altered to account
> Also thanks for your elaborate mail on extensibility.
More information about the nml-wg