From t-nakata at cw.jp.nec.com Wed Aug 2 03:25:00 2006
From: t-nakata at cw.jp.nec.com (Toshiyuki Nakata)
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 17:25:00 +0900
Subject: [graap-wg] [Fwd: WSAG Draft]
In-Reply-To: <44C772D3.2040906@scai.fraunhofer.de>
Message-ID: <000a01c6b60d$25549c90$ab84380a@ISIBASI>
Hi:
1)> AgreementSchemaTypes:
> wsa-Namespace is not used (should be removed)
OK.
>2) wsrf-bf: fault section could be moved to wsdl, therefore
> eliminating the dependency to wsrf-bf in the xml-schema (only
> in wsdl).
>
I am not sure whether below could be moved to wsdl or not.
Someone please comment.
On the other hand, I remember someone (Karl?)pointing out that
we do not need this ContinuingFaultType at all?
3)> AgreementAcceptanceSchemaTypes:
> Namespaces wsa and wsrf-bf should be removed since they were
> not used in the schema.
Uh.. do you mean Agreement Acceptance Port Type WSDL or Agreement State
Types Schema?
Best Regards
Toshi.
PS will there be a telecon tonight?
-----
Toshiyuki Nakata ??????
Executive Chief Engineer, Central Research Lab. NEC
1753, Shimonumabe, Nakahara-Ku,
Kawasaki,Kanagawa 211-8666,Japan
Tel +81-44-431-7653 (NEC Internal 22-60035)
Fax +81-44-431-7609 (NEC Internal 22-60509)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-graap-wg at ggf.org [mailto:owner-graap-wg at ggf.org]
> On Behalf Of Wolfgang Ziegler
> Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 10:49 PM
> To: Jim Pruyne; Nakata Toshi; GRAAP-WG
> Subject: [graap-wg] [Fwd: WSAG Draft]
>
> Dear all,
>
> Here are some comments from my colleague Oliver:
>
>
>
> Best regards
>
> Wolfgang
>
> --
> Wolfgang Ziegler www.scai.fraunhofer.de/ziegler.html
> Fraunhofer-Institute for Algorithms and Scientific
> Computing (SCAI)
> Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany
> Tel: +49 2241 14 2258; Fax: +49 2241 14 42258
>
> CoreGRID Network of Excellence www.coregrid.net
> Collaboration Gateway www.coregrid.net/cg
> Institute on Resource Management and Scheduling
> www.coregrid.net/irms
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 4038 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/graap-wg/attachments/20060802/009b0541/attachment.bin
From Wolfgang.Ziegler at scai.fraunhofer.de Wed Aug 2 03:55:25 2006
From: Wolfgang.Ziegler at scai.fraunhofer.de (Wolfgang Ziegler)
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 10:55:25 +0200
Subject: [graap-wg] [Fwd: WSAG Draft]
In-Reply-To: <000a01c6b60d$25549c90$ab84380a@ISIBASI>
References: <000a01c6b60d$25549c90$ab84380a@ISIBASI>
Message-ID: <44D0687D.7050000@scai.fraunhofer.de>
Dear Toshi,
as far as I remember, we decided to re-start the telecons
after GGF, so there shouldn't be one tonight.
Best regards
Wolfgang
Toshiyuki Nakata schrieb:
> Hi:
> 1)> AgreementSchemaTypes:
>> wsa-Namespace is not used (should be removed)
>
> OK.
>
>> 2) wsrf-bf: fault section could be moved to wsdl, therefore
>> eliminating the dependency to wsrf-bf in the xml-schema (only
>> in wsdl).
>>
>
> I am not sure whether below could be moved to wsdl or not.
> Someone please comment.
>
> On the other hand, I remember someone (Karl?)pointing out that
> we do not need this ContinuingFaultType at all?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 3)> AgreementAcceptanceSchemaTypes:
>> Namespaces wsa and wsrf-bf should be removed since they were
>> not used in the schema.
>
> Uh.. do you mean Agreement Acceptance Port Type WSDL or Agreement State
> Types Schema?
>
> Best Regards
> Toshi.
>
> PS will there be a telecon tonight?
> -----
> Toshiyuki Nakata ??????
> Executive Chief Engineer, Central Research Lab. NEC
> 1753, Shimonumabe, Nakahara-Ku,
> Kawasaki,Kanagawa 211-8666,Japan
> Tel +81-44-431-7653 (NEC Internal 22-60035)
> Fax +81-44-431-7609 (NEC Internal 22-60509)
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-graap-wg at ggf.org [mailto:owner-graap-wg at ggf.org]
>> On Behalf Of Wolfgang Ziegler
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 10:49 PM
>> To: Jim Pruyne; Nakata Toshi; GRAAP-WG
>> Subject: [graap-wg] [Fwd: WSAG Draft]
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Here are some comments from my colleague Oliver:
>>
>>
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>> Wolfgang
>>
>> --
>> Wolfgang Ziegler www.scai.fraunhofer.de/ziegler.html
>> Fraunhofer-Institute for Algorithms and Scientific
>> Computing (SCAI)
>> Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany
>> Tel: +49 2241 14 2258; Fax: +49 2241 14 42258
>>
>> CoreGRID Network of Excellence www.coregrid.net
>> Collaboration Gateway www.coregrid.net/cg
>> Institute on Resource Management and Scheduling
>> www.coregrid.net/irms
>>
--
Wolfgang Ziegler www.scai.fraunhofer.de/ziegler.html
Fraunhofer-Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing (SCAI)
Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany
Tel: +49 2241 14 2258; Fax: +49 2241 14 42258
CoreGRID Network of Excellence www.coregrid.net
Collaboration Gateway www.coregrid.net/cg
Institute on Resource Management and Scheduling www.coregrid.net/irms
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 2093 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/graap-wg/attachments/20060802/f98e5aa2/attachment.bin
From Oliver.Waeldrich at scai.fraunhofer.de Wed Aug 2 06:41:23 2006
From: Oliver.Waeldrich at scai.fraunhofer.de (=?utf-8?Q?Oliver_W=C3=A4ldrich?=)
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 13:41:23 +0200
Subject: [graap-wg] [Fwd: WSAG Draft]
In-Reply-To: <000a01c6b60d$25549c90$ab84380a@ISIBASI>
Message-ID: <00f001c6b628$95371540$51851a81@gelbwurz>
Hi Toshi,
To 2.)
The ContinuingFaultType is used in the AgreementFactory and the PendingAgreementFactory. Therefore it could/would make sense to leave it in the schema if it will be present in the final version (I don't know what the opinion of the others to the ContinuingFault topic is). But since the faults are more related to the specific port types respective the definition of its operation than to the Agreement protocol itself, I see the fault definition more in the wsdl files (at least this is just a question of flavor).
By the way, in e.g. the wsrf specification they have chosen a different way, they created just separate schema and wsdl-files, where all the wsrf-bf derived custom faults (e.g. ResourceUnknown, ResourceUnavailable) are specified.
To 3.)
With this I meant the Agreement State Types Schema. WSRF-BaseFaults and WS-Addressing are not referenced in the schema (and should be removed).
Best Regards
Oliver
-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: owner-graap-wg at ggf.org [mailto:owner-graap-wg at ggf.org] Im Auftrag von Toshiyuki Nakata
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 2. August 2006 10:25
An: 'Wolfgang Ziegler'; 'Jim Pruyne'; 'GRAAP-WG'
Betreff: RE: [graap-wg] [Fwd: WSAG Draft]
Hi:
1)> AgreementSchemaTypes:
> wsa-Namespace is not used (should be removed)
OK.
>2) wsrf-bf: fault section could be moved to wsdl, therefore
> eliminating the dependency to wsrf-bf in the xml-schema (only
> in wsdl).
>
I am not sure whether below could be moved to wsdl or not.
Someone please comment.
On the other hand, I remember someone (Karl?)pointing out that
we do not need this ContinuingFaultType at all?
3)> AgreementAcceptanceSchemaTypes:
> Namespaces wsa and wsrf-bf should be removed since they were
> not used in the schema.
Uh.. do you mean Agreement Acceptance Port Type WSDL or Agreement State
Types Schema?
Best Regards
Toshi.
PS will there be a telecon tonight?
-----
Toshiyuki Nakata ??????
Executive Chief Engineer, Central Research Lab. NEC
1753, Shimonumabe, Nakahara-Ku,
Kawasaki,Kanagawa 211-8666,Japan
Tel +81-44-431-7653 (NEC Internal 22-60035)
Fax +81-44-431-7609 (NEC Internal 22-60509)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-graap-wg at ggf.org [mailto:owner-graap-wg at ggf.org]
> On Behalf Of Wolfgang Ziegler
> Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 10:49 PM
> To: Jim Pruyne; Nakata Toshi; GRAAP-WG
> Subject: [graap-wg] [Fwd: WSAG Draft]
>
> Dear all,
>
> Here are some comments from my colleague Oliver:
>
>
>
> Best regards
>
> Wolfgang
>
> --
> Wolfgang Ziegler www.scai.fraunhofer.de/ziegler.html
> Fraunhofer-Institute for Algorithms and Scientific
> Computing (SCAI)
> Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany
> Tel: +49 2241 14 2258; Fax: +49 2241 14 42258
>
> CoreGRID Network of Excellence www.coregrid.net
> Collaboration Gateway www.coregrid.net/cg
> Institute on Resource Management and Scheduling
> www.coregrid.net/irms
>
From karlcz at univa.com Wed Aug 2 07:10:09 2006
From: karlcz at univa.com (Karl Czajkowski)
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 19:10:09 +0700
Subject: [graap-wg] [Fwd: WSAG Draft]
In-Reply-To: <000a01c6b60d$25549c90$ab84380a@ISIBASI>
References: <44C772D3.2040906@scai.fraunhofer.de> <000a01c6b60d$25549c90$ab84380a@ISIBASI>
Message-ID: <20060802121009.GY23335@moraine.localdomain>
On Aug 02, Toshiyuki Nakata modulated:
...
> On the other hand, I remember someone (Karl?)pointing out that
> we do not need this ContinuingFaultType at all?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Yes, I said we do not need this. It was introduced when we had a
negotiation interface (offers and counter-offers) to distinguish
between a problem in one message versus a problem in the resource. A
non-continuing fault indicated that the negotation resource was
effectively "dead" and no further offers would be accepted in the
context of that WS Resource by the party that generated the
non-continuing fault. We have no such stateful negotiation in
WS-Agreement at this point, AND it seems a pretty sophisticated way to
model faults considering we've done so little to model them in every
other way...
karl
--
Karl Czajkowski
karlcz at univa.com
From mumtaz at dps.uibk.ac.at Sun Aug 27 09:54:01 2006
From: mumtaz at dps.uibk.ac.at (Mumtaz Siddiqui)
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 14:54:01 +0000
Subject: [graap-wg] WSAG schema to java stubs: a confusion
Message-ID: <44F1B209.8000300@dps.uibk.ac.at>
Hi,
There is a confusion between schema description and generated Java stubs.
According to the WSAG specifications, multiple ServiceDescriptionTerms and
Preferences can be defined/described as shown in appendix 2/3 examples.
But, when we generate Java stubs (using WSDL2Java emmiter or castor), the
generated stubs provide these fields as single element instead of array
or vector.
For examle TermCompositorType class:
public class TermCompositorType implements java.io.Serializable {
private org.ggf.wsag.TermCompositorType exactlyOne;
private org.ggf.wsag.TermCompositorType oneOrMore;
private org.ggf.wsag.TermCompositorType all;
private org.ggf.wsag.ServiceDescriptionTermType serviceDescriptionTerm;
//???? Should not it array like ServiceDescriptionTermType[]????
private org.ggf.wsag.ServiceReferenceType serviceReference;
private org.ggf.wsag.ServicePropertiesType serviceProperties;
private org.ggf.wsag.GuaranteeTermType guaranteeTerm;
public TermCompositorType() {
}
...
}
Here I expect ServiceDescriptionTermType[] instead of
ServiceDescriptionTermType.
probably, here we can use domain specific terms like JobDefinition from
JSDL as
JobDefinition_Type[] jdefs = new JobDefinition_Type[2];
jdefs[0] = new JobDefinition_Type();
jdefs[1] = new JobDefinition_Type();
sdterm.set_any(AnyHelper.toAnyArray(jdefs));
sdterm.setServiceName(new NCName("job1"));
In this case the serialized XML document does not look like as expected!
See the serialized
form below:
....
....
Similarly, in case of BusinessValueListType class
public class BusinessValueListType implements java.io.Serializable {
private java.lang.Integer importance;
private org.ggf.wsag.CompensationType[] penalty;
private org.ggf.wsag.CompensationType[] reward;
private org.ggf.wsag.PreferenceType preference; <<<<<???????
private java.lang.Object[] customBusinessValue;
public BusinessValueListType() {
}
...
}
again I expect PreferenceType field as array like PreferenceType[].
Probably my understanding is wrong or the Java stubs are incorrectly
generated. Would be great if someone could explain it? How to specify
multiple terms and preferences using generated Java stubs?
Thanks
mumtaz
PS: Typo in wsag draft page 25? "A guarantee term can have one or more
service scopes.
A service scope describes to what service element specifically a service
applies."
May be the last 'service' is to be replaced with 'guarantee'?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: wsag_stubs.tgz
Type: application/x-compressed-tar
Size: 11877 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/graap-wg/attachments/20060827/6a5f0063/attachment.bin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3508 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/graap-wg/attachments/20060827/6a5f0063/attachment-0001.bin
From jim_pruyne at hp.com Wed Aug 30 01:11:18 2006
From: jim_pruyne at hp.com (Jim Pruyne)
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 01:11:18 -0500
Subject: [graap-wg] telecon on Aug 30
Message-ID: <44F52C06.9050402@hp.com>
All,
Our August hiatus is pretty much over, and GGF is only two weeks away,
so I would like to continue our telecons starting on the 30th at the
usual time and numbers:
9:00AM Central Daylight Time US (UTC-5)
which should be:
10:00AM Eastern Daylight Time US
1500 UK
1600 Germany
2300 Japan
2100 Thailand
Phone Number: 866-673-8466 in the US. 702-477-6031 for those outside the
US.
Conference code #8578310.
My goal is to get the group talking again, and firm up the plans for GGF.
Thanks.
--- Jim
From Wolfgang.Ziegler at scai.fraunhofer.de Wed Aug 30 02:33:16 2006
From: Wolfgang.Ziegler at scai.fraunhofer.de (Wolfgang Ziegler)
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:33:16 +0200
Subject: [graap-wg] telecon on Aug 30
In-Reply-To: <44F52C06.9050402@hp.com>
References: <44F52C06.9050402@hp.com>
Message-ID: <44F53F3C.2020906@scai.fraunhofer.de>
Jim, as I am attending the EuroPar Conference this week I am
not sure whether I am able to dial in. But I will try ;-)
Best regards
Wolfgang
Jim Pruyne schrieb:
> All,
>
> Our August hiatus is pretty much over, and GGF is only two weeks away,
> so I would like to continue our telecons starting on the 30th at the
> usual time and numbers:
>
> 9:00AM Central Daylight Time US (UTC-5)
> which should be:
> 10:00AM Eastern Daylight Time US
> 1500 UK
> 1600 Germany
> 2300 Japan
> 2100 Thailand
>
> Phone Number: 866-673-8466 in the US. 702-477-6031 for those outside the
> US.
> Conference code #8578310.
>
> My goal is to get the group talking again, and firm up the plans for GGF.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --- Jim
>
--
Wolfgang Ziegler www.scai.fraunhofer.de/ziegler.html
Fraunhofer-Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing (SCAI)
Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany
Tel: +49 2241 14 2258; Fax: +49 2241 14 42258
CoreGRID Network of Excellence www.coregrid.net
Collaboration Gateway www.coregrid.net/cg
Institute on Resource Management and Scheduling www.coregrid.net/irms
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 2093 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/graap-wg/attachments/20060830/931d40a8/attachment.bin
From Wolfgang.Ziegler at scai.fraunhofer.de Wed Aug 30 03:27:06 2006
From: Wolfgang.Ziegler at scai.fraunhofer.de (Wolfgang Ziegler)
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 10:27:06 +0200
Subject: [graap-wg] Workshop on WS-Agreement Implementations and Interoperability
Message-ID: <44F54BDA.4040203@scai.fraunhofer.de>
Dear all,
here is the final program for our workshop we will hold
Sunday prior to the OGF meeting.
The venue is the same place as for OGF:
Washington Convention Center
801 Mount Vernon Place NW
Washington, DC 20001
Room number is 155, the workshop will start at 1 pm
and will last four hours.
Best regards
Wolfgang
--
Wolfgang Ziegler www.scai.fraunhofer.de/ziegler.html
Fraunhofer-Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing (SCAI)
Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany
Tel: +49 2241 14 2258; Fax: +49 2241 14 42258
CoreGRID Network of Excellence www.coregrid.net
Collaboration Gateway www.coregrid.net/cg
Institute on Resource Management and Scheduling www.coregrid.net/irms
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: ws-agreement-workshop-schedule.txt
Url: http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/graap-wg/attachments/20060830/72c1f55b/attachment.txt
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 2093 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/graap-wg/attachments/20060830/72c1f55b/attachment.bin
From t-nakata at cw.jp.nec.com Wed Aug 30 09:15:30 2006
From: t-nakata at cw.jp.nec.com (t-nakata at cw.jp.nec.com)
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 23:15:30 +0900
Subject: [graap-wg] telecon on Aug 30
In-Reply-To: <44F52C06.9050402@hp.com>
References: <44F52C06.9050402@hp.com>
Message-ID:
Hi: Is the phone number correct?
I got the phone no. error.
I'll try again
Best Regards
Toshi
> All,
>
> Our August hiatus is pretty much over, and GGF is only two weeks away,
> so I would like to continue our telecons starting on the 30th at the
> usual time and numbers:
>
> 9:00AM Central Daylight Time US (UTC-5)
> which should be:
> 10:00AM Eastern Daylight Time US
> 1500 UK
> 1600 Germany
> 2300 Japan
> 2100 Thailand
>
> Phone Number: 866-673-8466 in the US. 702-477-6031 for those outside the
> US.
> Conference code #8578310.
>
> My goal is to get the group talking again, and firm up the plans for GGF.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --- Jim
>
-------
NEC ????????????
??????
Toshiyuki Nakata
Executive Chief Engineer
Central Research Laboratories
NEC Corporation
+81-44-431-7653
From Wolfgang.Ziegler at scai.fraunhofer.de Wed Aug 30 09:20:40 2006
From: Wolfgang.Ziegler at scai.fraunhofer.de (Wolfgang Ziegler)
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 16:20:40 +0200
Subject: [graap-wg] telecon on Aug 30
In-Reply-To:
References: <44F52C06.9050402@hp.com>
Message-ID: <44F59EB8.6090209@scai.fraunhofer.de>
Hi Toshi,
I used the number I stored in skype, it seems to be the
same as the one in the mail. I got the message that the
conference has not yet begun...
Best regards
Wolfgang
t-nakata at cw.jp.nec.com schrieb:
> Hi: Is the phone number correct?
> I got the phone no. error.
> I'll try again
> Best Regards
> Toshi
>
>> All,
>>
>> Our August hiatus is pretty much over, and GGF is only two weeks away,
>> so I would like to continue our telecons starting on the 30th at the
>> usual time and numbers:
>>
>> 9:00AM Central Daylight Time US (UTC-5)
>> which should be:
>> 10:00AM Eastern Daylight Time US
>> 1500 UK
>> 1600 Germany
>> 2300 Japan
>> 2100 Thailand
>>
>> Phone Number: 866-673-8466 in the US. 702-477-6031 for those outside the
>> US.
>> Conference code #8578310.
>>
>> My goal is to get the group talking again, and firm up the plans for GGF.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> --- Jim
>>
>
> -------
> NEC ????????????
> ??????
> Toshiyuki Nakata
> Executive Chief Engineer
> Central Research Laboratories
> NEC Corporation
> +81-44-431-7653
>
--
Wolfgang Ziegler www.scai.fraunhofer.de/ziegler.html
Fraunhofer-Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing (SCAI)
Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53754 Sankt Augustin, Germany
Tel: +49 2241 14 2258; Fax: +49 2241 14 42258
CoreGRID Network of Excellence www.coregrid.net
Collaboration Gateway www.coregrid.net/cg
Institute on Resource Management and Scheduling www.coregrid.net/irms
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 2093 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/graap-wg/attachments/20060830/df0bef4a/attachment.bin
From jim_pruyne at hp.com Wed Aug 30 09:46:18 2006
From: jim_pruyne at hp.com (Jim Pruyne)
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:46:18 -0500
Subject: [graap-wg] minutes from Aug 30 telecon
Message-ID: <44F5A4BA.4020203@hp.com>
Are attached below...
--- Jim
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: Aug3006-minutes.txt
Url: http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/graap-wg/attachments/20060830/4c77c2e6/attachment.txt
From jim_pruyne at hp.com Wed Aug 30 09:50:55 2006
From: jim_pruyne at hp.com (Jim Pruyne)
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:50:55 -0500
Subject: [graap-wg] GRAAP Sessions at GGF18
Message-ID: <44F5A5CF.5050808@hp.com>
All,
Here's a reminder on the sessions we have scheduled at the next GGF:
* Monday at 10:30 status and follow-on
* Monday at 2:00 on Interoperability
* Monday at 4:00 on Dynamic Agreements and Negotiation
I hope to see as many people as possible at these. Also, the
interoperability workshop will be on Sunday as Wolfgang sent out
earlier. We expect that some of the discussion in the two later
sessions will be continued from the workshop, so I hope that people will
come to those sessions with issues to discuss. Similarly, the first
session will largely be dedicated to determining what activities GRAAP
should begin after the spec. is complete, so I hope that people will
bring their ideas to those sessions. Anyone who has specific ideas they
would like to present should feel free to contact me and Wolfgang to let
us know what session you'd like time at, and what you'd like to
present. We'll do our best to accommodate any of these requests.
Thanks.
--- Jim