[glue-wg] Notes from OGF 28
navarro at mcs.anl.gov
Tue Mar 23 08:50:47 CDT 2010
Good point, in a relational design there might be many more tables
than would be desirable even in a fairly flat XML rendering.
However, I still think there a some common design considerations in
a flag XML rendering that could make it into a data transport format
for a relational GLUE 2 database. In other words, it is closer to a
fully normalized relational design than other GLUE 2 encodings, right?
On Mar 22, 2010, at 9:09 AM, <stephen.burke at stfc.ac.uk> <stephen.burke at stfc.ac.uk> wrote:
> glue-wg-bounces at ogf.org
>> [mailto:glue-wg-bounces at ogf.org] On Behalf Of JP Navarro said:
>> It seems like a flat XML rendering of GLUE 2 might actually be very
>> similar or identical in structure to a SQL rendering. If so, it
>> would be interesting to align these two implementations of GLUE 2.
> How do you deal with multivalued attributes and relations in xml? That's
> the thing which causes most difficulty in SQL, but doesn't xml just let
> you repeat things like LDAP?
> Scanned by iCritical.
More information about the glue-wg