[glue-wg] Some doubts
sergio.andreozzi at cnaf.infn.it
Thu Apr 17 11:51:59 CDT 2008
Burke, S (Stephen) wrote:
>> also here... I think Riccardo is right. The association from
>> StorageShare to DataStore should be changed from StorageShare to
>> alternatively, we can add in parallel if people really want
>> to discover the type of data store on which a storage share is
> I think we should keep the Share - Datastore relation as you can't
> deduce it in general if you only have Share - Resource. Maybe we could
> add a Share - Resource relation as well - but do we need it explicitly
> in the model if it's implied by the existing relations?
in the current modeling, it cannot be implied because storageResource is
associated to a dataStore via a many-to-many relationship.
It would have been possible in this case: storageResource 1--* dataStore
More information about the glue-wg